Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Paris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sophie Paris
Doesn't meet WP:PORN BIO for pornographic actresses. feydey 20:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. –Dicty (T/C) 22:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment before we start deleting stuff under WP:PORN shouldn't we wait for it to become policy? --Pboyd04 00:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:PORN BIO is not policy, but  I don't care to be policy-constrained bureaucrat anyway. -- GWO
 * Reply: WP:PORN and WP:PORN BIO are two different things. WP:PORN BIO covers performers; WP:PORN covers pornography in general. As for deleting stuff, this is ultimately up to fellow Wikipedians, and this sort of things is a litmus test for the WP:PORN BIO. As per How to create policy, policies are to be grown organically and are already codified from existing consensus on such issues. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 04:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable biography. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-04 01:37Z 
 * Delete wikipedia is not a list of every single actress, porno or otherwise -- MrDolomite 05:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 04:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Interesting that there is no consideration of her notability as a glamour model.  Almost looks like a nom for being involved in porn.  Vegaswikian 00:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.