Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Pyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Blonde Charity Mafia. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Sophie Pyle

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability. As seen from the fact that nothing links to this article. Sophie Pyle is not yet notable. Perhaps if this show airs, but it's more likely, this would be a good sub set of a Blonde Charity Mafia article. I wouldn't oppose a merge Arteros (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete A quick search for her comes up with masses of Twitter, Facebook and other such. Not a good sign. The TV thing hasn't aired yet. Oh dear... Mingling with Hilary Clinton and John Kerry? They are notable, all right. Notability isn't contagious under those circumstances. To be honest, I wouldn't think the TV thing will make her particularly notable if and when it airs - but I'm falling foul of WP:CRYSTAL myself there. Peridon (talk) 23:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge to Blonde Charity Mafia. JJL (talk) 01:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to Blonde Charity Mafia is fine with me, conditional on someone expanding the BCM article first. Otherwise, delete. Arteros (talk) 03:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I fail to see how the BCM merits an article under WP:CRYSTAL apart from concerns of notability. No-one else in the article has a WP article - apart from the USA and the TV network. Peridon (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment that's a separate discussion. As long as it exists, it seems like a good rd target. JJL (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.