Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Reynolds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Killiondude (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Sophie Reynolds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not meeting minimum inclusion requirements of WP:NACTOR. Couldn't find anything substantial from independent and credible sources to establish notability as per WP:GNG. Hitro  talk  08:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I came close to deleting this but am relisting out of an abundance of caution and a desire for a clearer consensus.
 * Delete or move to WP:Draftspace. Reynolds isn't there yet, in terms of WP:NACTOR, and none of the sourcing currently at the article convinces me that it's likely to be otherwise. Maybe this can be revisited in 1–2 years, so draftifying can be considered... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Save: I have created plenty of pages for actors and actresses who have had very small careers, but have been on the verge of starring in potentially big projects (Rhenzy Feliz and Teagan Croft are two examples), this one is no different. If you must however, we could save it.(Voicebox64 (talk) 00:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC))

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Borderline but she does have a lead role in two series. I'm a weak keep. Let's see what comes of the YouTube produced series. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Since WP:NACTOR was used as a requirement link by the nominator, I decided to take a look at exactly what the guideline suggested as "criteria" for article notability.
 * First is Significant roles in multiple TV Shows. She is credited with the lead role in at least 2 shows. The guideline doesn't define what exactly "multiple" is, but in my opinion, 2 is sufficient.
 * Second is Large fanbase or significant cult following. Her Twitter account has over 20 thousand followers and half a million on Instagram. Not Obama or Trump numbers, but that would be a significant following of fans.
 * Third is Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. That's very subjective and can be interpreted in many ways, but her fanbase would think that she has made a contribution, so I think she passes this test as well.-- JOJ Hutton  22:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NACTOR ("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions") as she's been a lead role in Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything, Youth & Consequences, and R.L. Stine's Mostly Ghostly: One Night in Doom House. Additionally, her personal life is often being reported in the news, further demonstrating interest in her as a person. Lonehexagon (talk) 19:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment- I am still not convinced that the subject has had significant roles in multiple notable TV shows. The YouTube thing, Youth & Consequences, has aired just one episode 4 days back. It is still not determined whether Youth and Consequences is notable or Sophie Reynolds has a significant role in this show. Hitro   talk  11:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.