Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Trollope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 22:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Sophie Trollope

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about a South African zoologist whose notability is not confirmed by Google, Google News or Google Books research. Warrah (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  -- kelapstick (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- kelapstick (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nom is correct regarding results of searches, not notable. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm afraid this is nothing more than a fan-page. Her webpage indicates she's properly considered as an activist rather than a behaviour expert / researcher / zoologist, etc. (Her quals are that she's a primary school teacher and evidently completed a 4-day "wolf behavior course" in 1998.) So, I don't think there's much we could even discuss regarding WP:PROF. Indeed, the wide net of GS turns up not a single hit, no books, etc. The listed achievements, e.g. "the first woman from South Africa to visit Wolf Park" and the 4-day seminar, lend no significance whatsoever. One source is listed, a short article in a local paper, but this appears to be a feel-good puff piece. For example, that article paints her as an established researcher, which she clearly is not, with statements like "Following her second visit to Wolf Park in 2002, Trollope came back more determined to finish her research on wolf-dogs". Plain googling doesn't turn up much else besides the epxected facebook/myspace/posting type hits. There simply isn't anything notable to speak of. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. Notability is not found as explained above. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete, claims of notability are false. Abductive  (reasoning) 08:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete meets neither  WP:PROF nor N:BIO. No papers listed in Scopus.    DGG ( talk ) 20:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.