Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophiophilia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted per discussion with author on talk page. Jclemens (talk) 04:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Sophiophilia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary, WP:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Not found in OED or Merriam-Webster Unabridged. Even if the construction existed, it would likely be "sophophilia" (as "sopho-" is the combining form), but that doesn't exist either.WP:SYN for the personal reflection on philosophy.

After I proposed deletion for the article, the author posted a link to a website that includes the term along with several others. That page itself notes that all the terms are neologisms coined by one person. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Everything Largoplazo stated is verifiably correct. I join his request to delete my article. --Sophieophil (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC).
 * On my talk page I replied to the author's inquiry about this with info on speedy deletion by author per WP:CSD G7. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per article creator Creator asks for deletion consistent with guidelines on the article's talk page, although they say neologisms should be included and the policy changed. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.