Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophisticated Patient


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Sophisticated Patient

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod'ded as a dicdef. Article creator removed prod and copypasted public domain material. Author is apparently trying to Right Great Wrongs. -- Finngall  talk  02:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete this abomination of an article. Text (something about prisoners as medical test subjects, which would duplicate Experimentation on prisoners) and title (google results would define this as a medical patient that is more knowledgable about his/her potential treatments, partly due to all the available online information) do not match. Subject as defined by the title would probably never develop beyond a dicdef. Even if the subject would pass WP:NOT, it would still need to be WP:TNTed. - HyperGaruda (talk) 04:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This extremely bad article is badly worded, and is not a phrase that the medical community or people in general use. According to the user, this is an ad for www.TruthContest.com, which is probably a conspiracy nut site. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 22:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - As per all of the above. This is an incomprehensible mess. GABHello! 22:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:SNOW time. I am not sure of what the article is supposed to mean, but I am not going to put any effort into investigating this. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all suggesting a solid encyclopedia article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.