Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorani abjad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was wrong venue. This should be brought to WP:RFD Salvio giuliano 21:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorani abjad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The Sorani abjad redirect is inaccurate, as the Sorani abjad is technically not an abjad and is an alphabet. Blahhmosh (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 21:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep Redirects don't need to be a fully accurate description of their target, as long as they are something people are likely to search for when looking for that target, and it would be easy for someone to mistakenly call it the "Sorani abjad" considering that it's based on Persian, which is an abjad. small jars 20:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment; It's a WP:RfD case, by the way. My understanding is that redirects should be discussed there. Suitskvarts (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You are right, that was a brain fart on my part. Salvio giuliano 21:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.