Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SorceryNet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

SorceryNet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:WEB. The one book reference that the article mentions is this. Joe Chill (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of notable and third-party mentions on Google, Google News and Yahoo. SwisterTwister  talk  02:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of major third-party coverage. PaintedCarpet (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.