Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soren (Underworld)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Underworld (film series).  So Why  21:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Soren (Underworld)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of real-world context surrounding the character; if the character did anything of importance in the film(s), it can be mentioned in the film articles' Plot or Cast sections. — Erik (talk • contrib) 22:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Underworld (film series). No notability outside that universe.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Character mentioned just once in passing in the review linked from the article. VG &#x260E; 03:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge together with the other vampires in the series to a combination article. I cant see a separate article any more than a staright delete. Thee's a source, so it isnt OR. The nom could have found those sources too, easily enough.  DGG (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. There are two sources, but they are hardly used, and don't help establish real-world notability. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.