Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soren Reinke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  howch e  ng   {chat} 21:09, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Soren Reinke
Zero Google hits for "Soren Reinke" and photosynthesis. Would expect a ref in the photosynthesis article if this were true. No articles link to this one, and this was the only edit by the user who created the article. Delete CLW 13:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: could this possibly refer to a botanist called Johannes Reinke? (Google search.) u p p l a n d 16:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I think you could be right. However, I'm not sure that moving the article to Johannes Reinke would be wise - if the author got the name wrong, the remaining details could also be incorrect. So I stand by delete for now. CLW 17:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 17:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - unreferenced article seems to be off-base on a few details. It would be better to delete than to consider a redirect or a merge (if the material were accurate and referenced I'd urge a merge into the appropriate section of photosynthesis. B.Wind 15:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per B.Wind. Stifle 20:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this really is Johannes Reinke, as I suggested above, it is better that somebody acquainted with his work starts a new, referenced article. As CLW points out, we can't trust a user who can't even get the first name right. It may well be one of those plausible hoaxes which sometimes stay around for years in the absence of flying Martian pigs or other obvious giveaways. u p p l a n d 21:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.