Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sosumi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Sosumi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are either trivial mentions or WP:QUESTIONABLE. Msnicki (talk) 08:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I expanded the article. Per WP:GNG, the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Two books, four newspapers (there are more in NewsBank), a couple reliable websites. One source called it a "classic sound". It has influenced other works, including appearing in a major film. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cardamom's sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep the newly expanded article. Meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks to the research and new references of Green Cardamom, there are now multiple in-depth reliable sources for this humble sound and the topic passes WP:GNG. The article itself is well formatted and in good shape. A notable topic and a well-formatted article suggests keeping the article. --Mark viking (talk) 02:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.