Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sotera Defense Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Sotera Defense Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for defense information services contractor. Makes a great deal of trivial community relations contributions, contains list of all the execs, no major national level awards, and no third party sources that aren't straight POR.  DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military -related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom: this looks suspiciously like one of the cookie-cutter articles on companies posted by spammers. According to this post by the article creator, it was written by an employee of the company (who appears to be under the not uncommon, but mistaken, belief that companies have some sort of entitlement to a Wikipedia entry). Nick-D (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.