Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soubhik Das (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. by Bbb23 per G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban and per the consensus here. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk |c|em ) 14:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Soubhik Das
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Same rational as last nomination Articles_for_deletion/Soubhik_Das. This person does not meet notability guidelines. Creator returned this to mainspace and left the AfC tags on. Legacypac (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The creator has moved this back to draft for the second time. It is at AfD now and a move back to draft is not acceptable. Legacypac (talk) 13:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  13:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  13:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No signs of any notability here. A few patents. Nomination (but not selection) to a Forbes "People to Know" list, not enough for an encyclopedia article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per previous nomination (which was disrupted), Wikipedia is not Facebook. Google search reveals that its subject exists and uses social media.  Duh.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable "nominee" to Forbes India's 30 under 30 list. Also lacking notability as an inventor. Salt should be considered given the attempts to circumvent AfD.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not Delete Wiki department Soubhik Das is student but his invention like rail line bullet camera is being used by Government of India and he will be awarded by Government of India on Indian Independence Day 2018. I am collecting the reference from Ministry of Science and Technology, India. Please Drafty the article so that I can update and publish the content when I will collect journals and notices from Government.--122.176.41.206 --Securityreligion (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 05:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I've brought the creator to ANi for their strange behavior. Legacypac (talk) 05:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - no sign of notability and even if he is given recognition on India's independence day there is no guarantee that the recognition will make him notable. That is by no means an automatic thing. So rather than keeping as a draft just in case he should receive a notable award in three month's time, delete the article now (most of it would not be kept in any case). --bonadea contributions talk 06:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * An award by Ministry is not notable? He is having 11 patents being at 21 years, so many research papers, big companies like Google, Intel, Infosys, Salesforce is calling a student at its event as an influencer for AI subjects is not notable? Strange, I am agreeing that he is not being covered by Indian media as such. Soon my references will include references from Government sites, Doordarshan news, Infosys site, Google Corporate websites, Facebook corporate etc. so draftying the article is appropriate and fair enough.--Securityreligion (talk) 07:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Securityreligion is this page about you or someone you know personally? Legacypac (talk) 07:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

No He is not me at all I am from Delhi, he is Pune based guy, well I am a professional from Haryana Govt. We have no relationship with each other far away or through any means--Securityreligion (talk) 07:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing any notability, we need third party RS having noticed him.Slatersteven (talk) 09:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * note Creator is moving to draft space. One might suspect ignorance or malfeasance. In any event, the AfD needs to run to a conclusion.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Again?Slatersteven (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.