Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Calibur IV (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, redirect, salt If/when this becomes non-crystal ballery, ask at DRV to review it. -  Daniel.Bryant  08:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Soul Calibur IV

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speculative article with no real info (WP:CRYSTAL). Previously deleted following 2005 vfd, reposted because of debunked confirmation. Several gaming sites ran a rumor on June 20, 2006 that Namco confirmed the title, when, in fact, this was an unsubstantiated guess by a reporter. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 10:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nominator. If that 'evidence' of another title in the series has turned out to be false, then there is nothing to say, and this counts as unsourced crystal ballism. J Milburn 11:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Soul series, with a mention there, and protect the redirect until this is no longer crystalballery. Sandstein 11:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect, just as Sandstein. It's certainly worthy of some mention, and one or two will look for it, so leave it as a protected redir until its time comes. (|--   UlT i MuS  19:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect is a very sensible idea. Mathmo Talk 16:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  (jarbarf) 19:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.