Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumya Jain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Soumya Jain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an online magazine editor, referenced entirely to primary sources (her own LinkedIn, etc.) with no evidence of any reliable source coverage to indicate that she actually passes any of Wikipedia's inclusion rules. Also possible WP:COI, as the creator has never contributed anything else to Wikipedia on any other topic. She might certainly qualify for a Wikipedia article that can be properly written and properly sourced, so no prejudice against recreation in the future if that can be done — but as currently written and sourced, this is barely more than a résumé. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete -Here are the all sources having less or more coverage of subject, if anyone is wondering about claims made in article, -,, . Subject at this time is ineligible for inclusion on Wikipedia for not meeting required standard, such as -WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  02:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding sources which rise to WP:BASIC --j⚛e deckertalk 03:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.