Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound & Fury (1982 album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Sound & Fury (1982 album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a non-notable album, failing WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM: I can't see evidence of it charting, and the only review I can find for it is an AllMusic one. As the article states that it only had a circulation of 800, with most copies being sold on the tour, then that appears to be another nail in the coffin. I am also nominating the following related page, as it was a re-recorded version of the 1982 album, doesn't appear to have charted either, and also appears to fail GNG (I've no idea who the Valdivia reviewer is supposed to be, and can't find any evidence of this review either):

Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 17:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable band, album reviewed in at least two reliable sources (Allmusic and Option, the latter in GBooks). --Michig (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – "a classic" according to the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, and I added an article in The Fresno Bee as well. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 21:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (tell me stuff)  @ 22:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep – Per above comments.Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.