Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound (sex toy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to urethral sounding.  MBisanz  talk 21:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Sound (sex toy)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unable to easily add references to this, which gives me doubt as to whether it should have an article. It seems that I'm not alone given the fact that it's been unreferenced since March 2012. I think this either needs references or it needs to be deleted for now. MZMcBride (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I just found urethral sounding. I guess it's safe to assume that it's used for sexual purposes. I'd settle for a redirect to urethral sounding. I don't think there's enough content for a standalone article. I'm not really sure it's a valid search term, though. Perhaps others have thoughts. --MZMcBride (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Obvious redirect That something can be used as a "sex toy" does not make it worthy of a separate article "as a sex toy." A long rifle shell could be used as a sex toy, but the idea of having an article on a rifle shell as a sex toy is ludicrous, as would be the hundreds of "possible" articles. (see also  Slinky (sex toy) Collect (talk) 13:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I would not like to have a rifle shell shoved up my urethra, thank you very much. That does not sound very pleasurable... Carrite (talk) 04:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to urethral sounding, which already covers this exact topic and is a much much older article. I don't want to merge this content do to the lack of sources. -LtNOWIS (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as the term is not viable for searching. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.