Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Awake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Three delete, with two keeps (one weak). The deletes argued well in line with policy, whilst the keeps did not. Therefore, the result is delete. Nja 247 07:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Sound Awake

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Queried speedy delete as not notable. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete For an album supposedly to be released this month, I'm finding bupkis. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The album is due out either late May or early July, so there will be a page for it then anyway. I can assume that the track listing and cover here is genuine,, so it seems like enough information to keep the page. It is quite an anticipated release from a well-known Australian band. Demonofthefall (talk) 09:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC & WP:CRYSTAL. Even if it had been released, it still wouldn't pass due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Artwork and a track listing does not an article make.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 04:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I just added a lot of information to the article and a link to the page of the first single from the album, which I wrote. Once the album is released, there will be a lot more information to put on the page, as well as pages for future singles. Two songs have been played on air now, one getting a lot of airplay and having a video. It is quite an anticipated release. Rowan5215 (talk) 07:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.