Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Healing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Sound Healing

 * – (View AfD)

Neutrality issues are so serious that it would be preferable to delete this completely and start again. PhilKnight (talk) 12:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There's not much here worth saving.  Cobbling together a bunch of questionable sources to try to make a case for the existance of something reminds me of the disaster at Work aversion. Gigs (talk) 13:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete it starts off sounding like new-agey bullshit, and then... well, then it goes downhill. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete just seems to be a grabbag of random sources to support what appears to be novel synthesis and OR. If there is a proper article in there I can't see it. --Cameron Scott (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an established modality of alternative medicine. JFW | T@lk  19:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.