Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Performance LTD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Sound Performance LTD

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

seems to fail WP:COMPANY and WP:GNG. nothing notable, nothing encyclopaedic, cannot see why its presence here is justified Rayman60 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can see only routine coverage of this firm: announcements of acquisitions then the closure of its plant. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and I frankly would've considered this speedy material as the Entrepreneur source is by all means, nowhere close to the needed substance, and there's simply nothing else actually better. SwisterTwister   talk  22:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as "corporate spam" (saw this elsewhere). :-) . K.e.coffman (talk) 06:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, promo piece; "corporate spam", indeed. Kierzek (talk) 01:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.