Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundview School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not an easy one to close, admittedly. Wizardman 15:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Soundview School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The notability of this school does not appear to be confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of School-related deletion discussions.   -- ~ Eóin (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I was able to find a few mentions in secondary sources, but not of any real significant discussion of the subject. Cirt (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Article makes specific claim of notability, supported by reliable source. Will consider upgrade if some of the additional sources available are added. Alansohn (talk) 05:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability has not been demonstrated; the article reads like any other school. (If significant reliable sources are found, I'd appreciate a ping on my Talk page so I can reconsider.) Alternately, merge if an appropriate target is found. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lynnwood, Washington. No need for this article at this time with its problems.  Vegaswikian (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with Vegaswikian. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability shown. Perhaps a merge per Vegaswikian's comment. RobJ1981 (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Certainly being "the first independent school to offer the IB Primary Years Programme in Washington, Oregon or Alaska.", is a reasonable claim to notability. However, there is some doubt that there is sufficient material available to develop a full page so I would not object to a merge to the locality. TerriersFan (talk) 22:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per contested notability, but seems like a likely search term. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  22:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.