Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sounergy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Sounergy
Non-notable website. Google returns 14 results, and only one seems related. Sulfur 06:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only one out of 6 Google hits is relevant, this is an inspiration explanation for a young corporation (heh...nice rhyme), and no Alexa rank for their website. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 06:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Dear Royboycrash I appreciate your trying to keep wikipedia as useful as possible i.e. We need more like you on the net! However, I added Sounergy because I thought it would be necessary to fully explain the wizor i.e. there is a link to it from the Wizor page I am working on. I respect you doing a google search and I to see that it comes up with limited results. However in the deletion policy it says articles have been kept with as little as 15 hits from google. I own a Wizor and am a big fan of the sound it gives my games, laptop etc... I could careless about Sounergy, Jebsen, or Rollei which are the only distributors of this product. (Also known as the Rollei Wizor). I do not work in the electronics industry I am a lawyer by trade. I hope you understand where I was coming from. Thanks Aaron.adams 08:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can see nothing about the Sounergy article that is "necessary to fully explain" the Wizor.  It just identifies Sounergy as the manufacturer; well, someone had to have manufactured it, after all.RGTraynor 19:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:WEB. Bad ideas 08:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as per Bad ideas, nn company, 14 hits on Google is essentially nonePeter 09:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -Dawson 05:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.