Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Souplantation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I've actually eaten there. Hope that doesn't mean I have a COI :( Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Souplantation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:51, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, 110 locations is not trivial. There are a couple viable sources in here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per TenPoundHammer. This is a chain found in various parts of the United States (under two different names, Souplantation and Sweet Tomatoes). Any problems with this article can and should be dealt with through normal editing, not deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable. Plenty of citations.-- JOJ Hutton  23:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable chain with over 100 restaurants.  I've removed some material and added a third-party ref, but more can be done with time. 72Dino (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the Wikipedia Dining Guide. Add you free listing now! sigh... -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * SNOW Keep suggested.  DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per the above; notable company that's received significant coverage in multiple sources.  Gongshow  Talk 03:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep I can't believe you nominated this well-known chain for deletion. I admit the article as nominated was short on outside sources; I just reworked and updated it. --MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.