Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Australian Defence Basketball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

South Australian Defence Basketball

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This non-professional social basketball organisation doesn't appear to meet the notability requirements set by WP:ORG. A Google search of 'South Australian Defence Basketball' (see: ) produces no results other than the organisation's own website and Facebook page and the article was started by User:Timothy.muehlberg who is listed in the article as being the association's woman's coach and is listed in a number of other roles on the association's website, including as its historian:. Nick-D (talk) 07:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   —Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per first line of nom. Wow, seems a lot of work has gone in to this, I bet the author is gonna be pissed when he sees this AFD ;) Ryan 4314   (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (reluctantly), I agree with the editor above me that a lot of work has gone into this, so if the consensus is "delete" I'll be happy to userify and post it to anyone's userspace. That said, it doesn't look like a particularly notable organisation, the only press I could find was this, and it's only a brief mention really.  This would indicate to me that the organisation does not pass WP:ORG.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.