Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Central Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. GNG met with a rewrite in the article needed. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

South Central Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage about the company. Let&#39;srun (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  00:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Advertising, Companies,  and Indiana. Let&#39;srun (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * There is substantial coverage and profiles, particularly in Evansville, Indiana, where this company was based, e.g.  + The company existed for decades, and coverage will likely be fairly easy to find in Evansville and other markets where they operated (e.g. Knoxville).  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 01:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Significant, independent reliable sources per Sammi Brie. Meets WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaireeodell (talk • contribs)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. In addition to Sammi Brie's sources above, I did find coverage here and here (one of Sammi Brie's clippings!). That's more than enough to pass GNG, though the article itself needs a re-write. ~ Tails   Wx  (🐾, me!) 03:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.