Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Czech Philharmonic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep: Withdrawn by nominator (me) and no outstanding delete !votes. Everymorning  talk  15:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

South Czech Philharmonic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This orchestra lacks the significant coverage in reliable sources needed to establish that it is notable. The coverage of it online is quite limited, there being only 27 Google results, and those all appear to be passing mentions. E.g. this link is a bio of someone who performed with the South Czech Philharmonic, among other orchestras. Everymorning  talk  18:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Hmm. I would think that a philharmonic orchestra would be notable simply by existing. They play a concert season every year and get coverage for that. Going to the Czech page and searching on their name "Jihočeská filharmonie" gets 11,000 hits (nominal, not actual). Via the Czech page and Google translate, here is one fairly in-depth story. And here is a story on their new hall. If they are getting a new concert hall built for them, they must be notable. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - pretty much exactly as above, Margin1522. Don't think this was a well thought through AfD nomination. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have been convinced by Margin1522's arguments and am therefore going to withdraw this nomination. Everymorning   talk  15:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.