Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dakota Gold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

South Dakota Gold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not a notable basketball team. I wasn't able to find sources that would make this team pass WP:ORG, especially to the depth that WP:ORGDEPTH requires. Tavix | Talk 01:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience  t 01:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience  t 01:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience  t 01:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Unsourced article about a minor league basketball team. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no references at all, let alone any reliable sources.  Article does not support WP:ORGDEPTH notability criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 03:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would've suggested moving to IBA, but as the nominator removed that and nominated the article deletion instead, and now considering multiple searches finding nothing significant and notable (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary), there's nothing to support this not to mention the IBA's article is unreferenced as well. SwisterTwister   talk  19:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. This article clearly fails WP:BASKETBALL and it has no sources at all which does not prove any notability. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.