Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dakota Panhandle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

South Dakota Panhandle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced, no evidence of existence (i.e., being known as the South Dakota Panhandle) or significance in reliable sources. Fails WP:NGEO, possibly original research. Complex / Rational 14:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Dakota. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * delete I'm not finding enough that convinces me that there is such an area. Mangoe (talk) 19:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I have proposed the map appearing in the article for deletion on Commons, as it consists solely of a screenshot of Google Maps (which is copyrighted). Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Good catch. It seems that would fall under speedy deletion criterion F3 (derivative work of non-free content). I went ahead and tagged it as such. Complex / Rational  22:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Violates WP:V. Could potentially be deleted per WP:CSD as a hoax. -- Kinu t/c 21:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - potentially a meme. In any case, I'm not seeing any RS which discuss anything by this name. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  15:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.