Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dakota Rock and Roll Music Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

South Dakota Rock and Roll Music Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Presumed lack of notability. No sources found in a short search. Spiesr (talk) 03:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found nothing that can even be considered coverage. Non-notable. SL93 (talk) 05:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  02:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable enough for an article. I realize this means next to nothing, but I live in Sioux Falls and I've never even heard of this. – TC N7  JM  12:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I would never assume an organization is not notable, but this seems to be NN. A quick online search does not reveal any stories otuside of local interest.  I'd be willing to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 7.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  07:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.