Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dakota abortion law controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep (nomination withdrawn) . — FireFox (υ|τ) 09:16, 23 April 2006

South Dakota abortion law controversy
This page is the result of a non-consensus, non-proposed move of the original page South Dakota reproductive rights controversy Struct 05:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete then redirect to South Dakota reproductive rights controversy. Arbusto 05:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. "Reproductive rights" is a patently POV term.  Redirect that page to this one to be in alignment with the NPOV policy.  --Jakes18 05:44, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually its "abortion" that is POV. That is why we use the terms "pro-Life" and "pro-Choice." Also I see you were one of two people to edit the article. Arbusto 06:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I hate to disagree with a supporter, but I don't look at the term abortion as POV per se; in fact, the original article uses that term several times. The duplicate we're discussing here still needs to be removed however. Struct 06:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, redirect to South Dakota reproductive rights controversy, then resolve the title dispute like civilized people instead of taking unilateral action. Struct 05:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this duplicate article, then settle the title and content of the original article through the normal means for resolution of content disputes. I favour "abortion" in the title myself, because that is what the law actually prohibits, but this is not the forum to settle such an issue. Metamagician3000 08:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a fork, but reproductive rights is POV, should be renamed. -- E ivindt@c 11:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice regarding any future move of South Dakota reproductive rights controversy. Any decision involving a name change should be made on the article's talk page. NoIdeaNick 14:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV fork. --Ter e nce Ong 16:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, as per Metamagician3000. Creating duplicates is not the right way to solve naming disputes. David Sneek 17:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fork. Editors should settle the naming issue, then move the page. Delete so as to make South Dakota abortion law controversy available for the move, without prejudging whether the move should be made. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fork and do not redirect, as above. -- Mithent 22:00, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.