Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korea national under-14 football team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. Secret account 14:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

South Korea national under-14 football team

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication that this topic has been the subject of significant coverage. C 679 09:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * 8 other topics listed below are being added to the discussion under the same criteria.



Thanks, C 679 09:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 09:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all - no evidence of notability. Could be merged and redirected to any U15 or U16 teams if the community does not want to delete. GiantSnowman 12:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - The South Korea FA has information specifically on the South Korea national under-14 football team here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2nyte (talk • contribs) 00:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Primary sources do not establish notability. C 679 13:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  ♔  03:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete all - no way laundry lists of non-notable juniors are going to pass our inclusion guidelines (like WP:NFOOTY). I'm not even sure competition between any of those teams would generate enough coverage to be considered notable. Stalwart 111  10:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.