Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korean parliamentary election, 2008


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.  Singu larity  19:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

South Korean parliamentary election, 2008
Due to the lack of information avaliable, it seems pointless to have created this page. I am nominating this for deletion and then it can be recreated later next year when the candidates who run actually announce. Davidpdx (talk) 04:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, well-formed stub (templates, etc.) for an event certain to happen in just 124 days. Why bother with process when it's this close? --Dhartung | Talk 04:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dhartung. Why bother? -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 04:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep As noted, it's properly formatted adn will obviously be filled with more information as we go along. Nick mallory (talk) 05:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but expand past a substub. —dima/talk/ 05:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep no point in deleting just to recreate in a few days. This is a confirmed, notable, future event.  If it was the 2020 election, or something like that it would be different.  But this is clearly a notable event.  --Jayron32| talk | contribs  05:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone, I guess. Maxamegalon2000 06:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even though this is crystal ball gazing, and I am about to say that other stuff exists, a recent AfD passed as 'keep' (but with a name change to Next Australian federal election). See Articles for deletion/Australian federal election, 2010. Littleteddy (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It is about very important future event in South Korea. --Appletrees (talk) 13:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above. — Nightstallion 14:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is always useful to have articles about upcoming elections, in order to invite people to put information in them. --Checco (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep since if it's not there people might not bother to create the article, and people will expand on this article soon since it is almost 2008. Styro foam 1994 DiscussionContribs 22:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.