Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Lanark Community Garden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

South Lanark Community Garden

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Probably way WP:TOOSOON for this new community garden. Google only has 10 results, and according to the organization this garden was only formed in September. Very few articles with SIGCOV of this org. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  00:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  00:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * According to the press release regurgitated by The Toronto Star ("are thrilled to announce"), the non-profit company was formed in September, and the garden has been around longer than that. Of the 6 sources cited in the article, two are press releases where people "announce" stuff, and three are autobiography, written in the first person.  The remaining one is  (theHumm) which is in depth, and apparently not a mere regurgitated press release or the people writing about themselves.  The problem is that it appears to be the only such source in existence.  I cannot find any others.  One such source is insufficient; multiple sources are needed.  Uncle G (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we need multiple sources to show notability per GNG. Actually, this is going to fall under the organization notability guidelines, which requires more than just multiple sources that pass GNG, but it does not even pass GNG, so there is no way it passes organization notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.