Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Melbourne Cecil Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. (aeropagitica) 16:15, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

South Melbourne Cecil Street
A minor street in South Melbourne, not notable for anything out of the ordinary. -- Longhair\talk 23:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Longhair\talk 23:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteNo assertion of notability. Unless it is improved with some real assertion to being of historical interest. If the buildings on the street are of historic they deserve their own article. If there are enough articles relating to buildings on this street then recreate the article and link them together.Garrie 00:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete has some historical buildings and people walk their dogs on the street? Seriously, someone thought this was notable? --Canley 03:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Google News Archive search comes up with some hits regarding to meetings at the Southern Cross Hotel, a protest at the South Melbourne Centrelink and various businesses being located in the street. The article doesn't make  a strong case for notability and I can't find any. Capitalistroadster 04:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, so what if there is historical buildings here?? Don't see any need for inclusion here. There is nothing to convince me that the article deserves to be kept. Ter e nce Ong 07:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable street - see Melway map - the Centrelink and the South Melbourne Market are the only notable things on it, and the latter could have its own article if notable. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Orderinchaos78 08:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough - but South Melbourne Market should have its own article. I particularly liked "Popular dogs in this area include Pug, Shih Tzu, and Maltese Dog" though. JROBBO 11:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable street. However, can we make it compulsory for every geographic based article to mention which breed of dog you're most likely to see there?  --Roisterer 00:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * "Popular dogs in this area include Pug, Shih Tzu, and Maltese Dog". Delete.  Lankiveil 05:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.