Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Shields RFC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to South Shields.  Sandstein  14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

South Shields RFC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Amateur rugby team that doesn't appear to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to South Shields. Plenty of local and routine sources that mention the team, but I wasn't able to find anything that was sufficiently in-depth to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. However, it is a plausible search term, and we do have some information about the team at South Shields, so a redirect seems a good alternative to deletion. Probably not worth a merge given that the article is entirely unsourced. Lowercaserho (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:19, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.