Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Texas Family Planning & Health Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

South Texas Family Planning & Health Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a non-notable health organization in Texas (quite obviously created and edited by its employees, e.g. ). PROD was removed on the basis that "deletion w/o discussion is likely to be controversial - everything with family planning is controversial". I had endorsed the PROD after doing a thorough search. The subject quite comprehensively fails WP:ORG in terms of both depth and breadth of coverage with no other mitigating factors. The only references to it are Texas directory listings, their own website, one story on a local news site, KRIS-TV, about a woman who used their breast cancer clinic and another very brief mention on the same site in an article about the importance of flu vaccination. Voceditenore (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Voceditenore (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Voceditenore (talk) 11:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Voceditenore (talk) 11:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been notified to WikiProject Hospitals. Voceditenore (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete no attempt has been made to add any refs after several notices the original creator and subsequent IP only appear to be single purpose accounts for promotion of this non-notable organisation. Note: I have looked myself and failed to find any sources to show notability. KylieTastic (talk) 12:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 00:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * delete as above, seems promotional - needs more substantial references to establish notability?. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.