Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South african legislation 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 01:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

South african legislation 2006

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Data dump. Punkmorten 15:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a random directory!Madmedea 15:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed... "2006 legislation on the way". Delete before the creator can get to 1999, please. We are not an index of law codes. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-26 00:37Z 
 * Delete. Agree with the nomination. This is not an encyclopedia article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Entirely worth an entry.  Compare with 110th United States Congress.  Obviously passes notability standards, as I don't see how anyone can argue that an entire year's worth of legislation could possibly fail notability.  Article does need work to make it more substantive, however.  --notJackhorkheimer (talk / contribs) 20:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep There are similar lists of UK statutes, which are mostly red links, but these can subsequently be linked to articles that refer to them, if not articles on them. Peterkingiron 23:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.