Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southampton First


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Southampton First

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This political party would appear to fail the general notability guideline. As 2007 establishment, it would be reasonable to expect an internet presence. I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject in online sources. I doubt there are offline sources that would pass the general notability guideline for the subject of this article. As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Shirt58 (talk) 12:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject appears to fail general notability as well as WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Zangar (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Clearly NN, sicne it does not claim to have won an election even at a local level. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. fails GNG and WP:ORG. "young and good looking candidates keen to exploit their passion for local politics" do not  a notable club make. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.