Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southdown PSV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. as per the discussion has no clear consensus since it was opened last December 22, 2012. This discussion has been available for discussion for over 5 weeks with 4 relistings. This will get to nowhere as per the discussion has few participants giving their own opinion but unfortunately, it fails to meet a clear consensus. (non-admin closure) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Southdown PSV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:CORP: Just another bus company... bobrayner (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment -- from the look of the navbox template, it would seem that we usually do have articles on local bus operators. Whether we should is a differnet question.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Page is used on many templates and other locally-related pages - removing page would create many redlinks on other pages. I am also very knowledgeable on this subject, granted it has not any sources, but will endevour to find some when possible. Thanks. Tom the Tomato (talk) 21:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * By "many templates" you mean one template, yes? It was on Bus companies in South East England. I have fixed that now, so the redlink problem has gone away. Not that it should make any difference since that seems unconnected to our deletion policy. Is there any evidence that Southdown PSV is notable? bobrayner (talk) 15:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * (Incidentally, that's a very big navbox listing bus companies. I think some other ones on that navbox might be good candidates for AfD). bobrayner (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - no evidence the company meets WP:NCORP notability criteria. I can't find any news coverage. There isn't even much on the company's own website, so presumably most of the article is WP:OR. Sionk (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect somewhere - A Google News search provided results here (brief mention through a company duty manager) and here (both of these are for an armed robbery on a Southdown PSV, this second link is an interview with the bus driver), here (another brief mention), here (brief acknowledgement for their services) and finally here (the company caused trouble in 2007 after discontinuing two routes). The company is probably well known in that local region but there isn't much for a Wikipedia article at this time so I wouldn't object to a redirect somewhere as this company is still relevant to that area's transit system. SwisterTwister   talk  05:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 03:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Close as no consensus - Relisting four times is just silly. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Though the 'keep' comment seems to have an erroneous argument and the 'merge' suggestion' gives no target article! Sionk (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I gave no target because this bus company serves many areas and I didn't know which target would be appropriate but I suppose if I had to choose, it would be selectively merge to Copthorne, West Sussex. SwisterTwister   talk  03:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.