Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast Europe Coalition on Whistleblower Protection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Southeast Europe Coalition on Whistleblower Protection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Article about an organization with no strong claim of notability per WP:ORG, and no strong reliable source coverage to get it over WP:GNG -- this is based almost entirely on primary sources, with the exception of a single piece of media coverage which isn't about the organization, but merely features a member of it giving soundbite about the topic that is the subject of the article. This is not the type of sourcing that gets something like this into Wikipedia. Bearcat (talk) 04:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisations-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - When reviewing the references, I was originally leaning toward keep, but I have discovered that there is not enough coverage to merit inclusion per WP:ORG or GNG. It does have good coverage by one or two other NGOs. A Google News search reveals one real news story containing only passing mention in the form of a quote by the organization and one of its members. It is unfortunate because I think this organization will really help make a difference in former eastern bloc nations, but for now this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. I suggest revisiting this topic in a year or two because by then it may have garnered enough coverage in reliable sources to merit inclusion in Wikipedia. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.