Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast Limburgish dialect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Southeast Limburgish dialect

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable dialect. One of the hundreds of the articles based on wp:OR and wp:SYNTH written by user:Ad43 (a Germanic languages "academic", also called nl:Gebruiker:AJW in the Dutch Wikipedia). It's not clear whether the article should be deleted as pure original research or merged somewhere. I couldn't find anything on the web that could be considered reasonable or reliable about this dialect. Ingadres (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Limburgish language. Merge if the information can be verified, although it seems that the publisher of the cited book is not a traditional publisher but the local historical society of Geldern/Venraij. Cnilep (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the page on the Dutch language wikipedia has some sources. No specific reason to delete this particular dialect of Limbabwe. MLA (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: At 11:22, 3 March 2011 someone editing from the IP address 109.65.119.99 removed comments by MLA, noting in the edit summary, "removing my vote; i abstain". Those comments were restored by User:Cnilep at 12:48, 3 March 2011.
 * With thanks to Cnilep for the revert, I do of course wish to retain my stated position on this article. Quite an amusingly clever bit of minor vandalism by whoever removed my comment in the first place.  MLA (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.