Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast North Dakota State University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete  as clearly not worthy of inclusion. While fictional elements from unreleased works do not appear to fall within any speedy deletion criterion, the consensus here is clear. Jclemens (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Southeast North Dakota State University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence for existence of author or work in which this fictional institution supposedly features. See previous AfD for Going Home: My Work Here is Complete. PamD (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fictional university.--v/r - TP 18:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable at best, hoax at worst. BTW being fictional is not in itself a reason for deletion, see for example List of fictional Oxbridge colleges.  But this fictional entity appears to be, well, a fiction.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fictional college in a non notable fictional book by a non notable author seems a pretty good reason to delete. We have an assumption of notability in many of the notability guidelines, why not assumption of non notability?--v/r - TP 19:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * My point was simply that being fictional does not in and of itself imply non-notability. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I get that, I was hasty in my comments.--v/r - TP 20:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fictional university in non-notable novel. Tyrol5   [Talk]  20:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. That looks like a clear A7 to me.— S Marshall  T/C 21:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails WP:GNG due to lacking significant reviews, treatments, syllabii, or stories outside the original source, a short story. It is not in the categories of "speedy-deletable" types of articles, which have a "assumption of non notability". Bearian (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. If the short story was notable, a redirect would be appropriate, but the short story is also non-notable. Clear case here. Neutralitytalk 23:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as failure to WP:GNG. Not a single source provided, and possibly even hoax. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.