Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southend Triathlon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Southend Triathlon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. not all triathlons are notable. And this is a future one so WP:CRYSTAL applies as well. LibStar (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Further consensus - no input Nordic   Nightfury  11:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  11:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. Notability not ascertained as has no secondary sources. Nordic   Nightfury  11:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -Violates WP:NOT, also the last line, "Southend Triathlon will support up to 200 local athletes and support Havens Hospices who provide healthcare in Essex" is written as a promotional, as it lacks context and offers no information beyond the service it provides. This "article" is more of a news item of some future possibility, not established fact or well-grounded theory worthy of an encyclopedia. And probably also, WP:NOTNEWS--J. M. Pearson (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as literally nothing else for actual significance as it is, let alone notability and substance. SwisterTwister   talk  05:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.