Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Fans' College Poll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Neutralitytalk 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Southern Fans' College Poll

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable college football poll that existed for four years and no longer does. The members of the poll are non-notable (as far as I can tell) college football fans with no ties to the media or to NCAA programs. X96lee15 (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  —X96lee15 (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article cites no coverage of this poll in independent reliable sources,and I could find none. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete "blogspot" doesn't really qualify for the kind of sources we need.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No directly relevant independent reliable sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:GNG, there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources are all self-published (I removed text and sources that were used for irrelevant discussion of  BCS poll and possible POV-push that it was being considered for inclusion in BCS rankings.)  This article could be considered WP:PROMOTION, as the poll's website at http://scfpoll.blogspot.com/p/about-poll.html says "For more information, including historical polls, click here", and clicking links back to the Wikipedia article.  WP is serving as a repository for this organization! —Bagumba (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (non-notable), Arxiloxos and Metropolitan (no reliable sources), and Bagumba (self-promotion). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.