Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 4450


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Southern Pacific 4450

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is literally just a random SD9 that isn't remarkable in any way. Fails GNG by a mile, with what isn't straight up original research sourced only to one dude's self published railfan site and a single museum which once owned the locomotive. This isn't even a preserved locomotive. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It very much seems to be a locomotive that had a normal life as a locomotive, which is good but also not notable. TartarTorte 13:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Saddens me as a railfan, but this and the 4450 could be a brief mention in the main article about the locomotive type themselves, nothing notable about these two. Leaning delete. Oaktree b (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I can agree with you on that front. While there are wikis specifically for trains, none have anything close to the viewership, credibility, or centralization of wikipedia. I wish there were a way to keep non-notable but generally interesting articles in maybe a different way. TartarTorte 19:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.