Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Urbanism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Southern Urbanism

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no significant coverage in reliable sources, and the current sources in the article are merely passing mentions. This fails to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and North Carolina. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't seem to pass WP:NORG, and the term itself appears to be mostly used as a completely different concept in urban studies. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails notability guidelines; no indepth reliable sources except mentions found. Toadette  ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: If someone were able to find one or several hot-button topics that the publication advocated for or against in a manner that brought attention to the publication on a regional, national, or international scale, it would warrant the page being kept (and expanded). However, more coverage is needed to meet notability, and no such publication attention has been found (as of yet). Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 2:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.