Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southgate, Sylvania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Sylvania, New South Wales. One editor asserts that sources exist, but the only 2 actually provided don't meet the requirement that the sources cover the subject "in-depth". Until sources are actually provided that meet this requirement, article should be redirected Qwyrxian (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Southgate, Sylvania

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ORG. I found two sources with no significance to prove notability. Till I Go Home (talk) 01:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * delete fails WP:ORG. No evidence of notability outside its local area. LibStar (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously. Check out this cat Category:Shopping_centres_in_Sydney to see how many articles we have about various shopping centers in Sydney that are most probably not notable around the world (and which are?)--Avala (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. you have failed to provide any sources on how this meets WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but you have failed to provide any valid reasons for deletion that could be addressed.--Avala (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * no reliable sources, no notability, as a keep voter you must show sources, did you bother to look? LibStar (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * When you searched Australian sources like newsbank, what did you find? What Australian sources did you look at? --LauraHale (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And what policy says that because there are other Sydney shopping malls makes this article not eligible for deletion? Till I Go Home (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:N is not established. Ipsign (talk) 13:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 12:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Sources are hard to find because the name used in the article title is not the common name for it, which is "Southgate Shopping Centre." It is mentioned in several places online newspaper wise including the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. When "Southgate Shopping Centre" + Sylvania are searched on Newsbank, the following results are:
 * St. George and Sutherland Shire Leader (Rockdale, Australia) (20)
 * Daily Telegraph/Sunday Telegraph/Sunday Telegraph Magazine (Sydney, Australia) (13)
 * Sydney Morning Herald, The (Australia) (6)
 * Australian, The/Weekend Australian/Australian Magazine, The (Australia) (1)
 * Courier Mail, The/Sunday Mail, The/QWeekend Magazine (Brisbane, Australia) (1)
 * Given the mall appears to date to 1964 and Newsbank only goes back to 2000, it seems highly probable offline notable, non-digitised sources exist that support WP:GNG. --LauraHale (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BURDEN as applied to WP:V. Even if sources may exist, they are not cited here or in the article.  Sandstein   06:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.