Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southlands Boulevarde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Southlands Boulevarde

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. very limited coverage, and it's routine. just a small suburban shopping centre. LibStar (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It's small? What is your evidence that it is small?  Unscintillating (talk) 00:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Non notable shopping centre WP:MILL. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Relatively small shopping centre, only routine coverage.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  16:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find the GLA, or even if it is an indoor mall.  I found one hit on Google news from SMH, that said that this is one of five properties that together is worth $500 million, but there were no more details.  The only clue that this is a notable shopping center was, which says that there are 61 specialty stores, which would be in the range of a regional shopping center.  Something that is surprising to me is that the trading hours are 9:00 am to 5:30 pm weekdays, closing at 5pm on weekends.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable shopping centre. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.