Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sovena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Sovena

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was a copyvio/advertisement. It has already been speedily deleted three times as advertising. This time, other editors removed the advertising, but left it in a state where it gives no context. Perhaps there will be a legitimate article some day, so don't salt, but delete? —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is notability to be found, if one looks for it. This may not be the article that we want about this company, but it should be possible to find sources to improve it.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Mere notability of the topic doesn't save an article, as speedy deletion for having no content or no context or for consisting entirely of advertising or copyright violations applies even for article with notable topics. This article is one that can be speedily deleted. I only brought it here for discussion in order to permit WP:CSD G4 in the future. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete IMO, it doesn't meet WP:CORP. I googled it, and the first twenty hits I checked were first a link to the company website and then how to get a job there, plus other businesses that share the same name.--el Aprel (facta-facienda) 20:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nutrinveste, Sovena's parent company. Sovena is probably notable enough for its own article (See ), but I don't think we're going to find enough information for it to ever be more than a stub. For now it should be part of the Nutrinveste article.  Linguist At Large  20:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--the way I look at it, this is still an ad. "More and more a reference," that's (weaselish) promotion. Drmies (talk) 20:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Here are some pay per view sources to establish Sovena's notability. It looks like Sovena is the second largest olive oil producer in the world.  Linguist At Large  20:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a miracle the article never claimed that, or found any of those references. Drmies (talk) 21:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing but promotion. If a real article was to be written, it wouldn't be G4-able. Jclemens (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. This business may be notable.  But the current content - Sovena is more and more a reference in olive oil global market. In order to aggregate several companies, promote a specialization in each stage of olive oil life, being present from production all the way through to distribution - can only serve to mislead readers to conclude that we actually have an article about this potentially notable business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.