Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sovereign Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Sovereign Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no assertion of notability Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree, article fails to assert any notability Warfieldian (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local radio conglomerate: a radio broadcasting company which owns 15 radio stations in the upper peninsula of michigan. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as I have expanded and properly sourced the article so that it now crossed the verifiability and notability thresholds. Company is regional, not merely local, and controls the majority of radio stations in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. - Dravecky (talk) 21:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Being FCC regulated adds a national perspective, article much improved.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Current version of the article seems to satisfy notability, while some of the sources are a bit iffy, there are a few ones that clearly pass the notability standard. Monty 845 (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Article should probably be moved to Sovereign Communications, LLC, because there is an FCC regulated Sovereign Communications Corporation in Texas. Unscintillating (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply Per Naming conventions (companies) this article would remain at Sovereign Communications and the other would be named Sovereign Communications Corporation with hatnotes guiding readers of each to the other article. ("The article is about the company based in Michigan. For the Texas company, see Sovereign Communications Corporation.") - Dravecky (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.